« Ladies, Can't Have An Orgasm? Let's Medicate You! | Main | Child Abuse Experts Applaud Legal Community for Rejecting Parental Alienation Syndrome »
July 10, 2006
Lizzie Borden: Did She Or Didn't She?

I always thought that Lizzie Borden had committed the murders, but after visiting her house in Fall River, Massachusetts, I'm firmly convinced of it now. I had the adventage of seeing the house and hearing the full story to help me come to my conclusion.
Do you think she did it? Tell me in comments.
Lots of people don't know that Lizzie Borden was a small woman. I saw one of her dresses at the house. She couldn't have been more than five foot nothing and only about 100 pounds. I bet the jury couldn't imagine such a tiny, delicate woman committing such heinous acts. The nursery rhyme had it wrong. She hacked her stepmother about twenty times, not forty. She hacked her father's head up even more than that, but not forty-one times. Still, hacking someone's head into a bloody pulp like that was definitely a crime of passion. It was overkill. She hated her father and stepmother.
I asked the tour guide how Lizzie's stepmother felt about living such a frugal life, and she was apparently okay with it. I should have asked why Lizzie hated her stepmother so much, but I didn't think to ask about that. Lizzie's father had bought her stepmother's parent's house to keep them from being evicted. Stepmom was grateful. Lizzie wasn't. She threw a hissy fit over why Daddy bought a house for Stepmom's family, but wouldn't buy a mansion for Lizzie and her older sister. Yet another reason to kill off Daddy and Stepmom to get all that wealth for herself.
I rather liked the house. I like small, cozy houses. If it was for sale as a single family home, I would buy it, ghosts and all. Lizzie obviously had other ideas. The room she was originally in was very small. When she was older, she convinced her older sister to switch rooms with her. Her new room was much larger, but it was still on the small side. One of the doors to Lizzie's room opened into the Master Bedroom, where Daddy and Stepmom slept. Lizzie moved her bed catty-corner against the wall, blocking the door to that room. After Daddy had enough of Lizzie stealing from him (yup, she robbed her own Pa), he locked the door to the Master Bedroom from the inside. Lizzie never went in there again. The only way to get to the Master Bedroom was by the back stairs. There was also no hallway upstairs. The house was originally built as two apartments. There was little privacy upstairs. Daddy and Stepmom would have originally had to go through Lizzie's new bedroom to get to their own room, unless they went up the back stairs. The lack of privacy surely grated on Lizzie's nerves. I know I wouldn't like it.
Lizzie was also stoned on morphine and another drug whose name escapes me at the moment before the murders and during the trial. That's one reason why her story changed so much. She said that at the time of the murders that she had been in the barn eating pears. The police saw a thick layer of dust in the barn. No one had been there in at least three months. There were no leftover pear cores in there. Lizzie also said that she was looking for (I think) lead to use to go fishing. There was nothing in the barn that could have been used for fishing. Her story was flimsy. No one knows where Lizzie was when her parents were murdered. That's one of the case's big mysteries. The maid thinks she heard Lizzie laughing when she (the maid) ran downstairs to let Daddy in the house, since the front door was locked. He had come home from work early because he was sick after eating that rancid mutton broth for breakfast. Ew. I can understand wanting to eat leftovers to be frugal, since we do it, but rancid mutton broth? Sometimes leftovers need to be tossed. Daddy was so frugal that he was a cheapskate.
I agree with Sheelzebub that Lizzie Borden was a sociopath. She was only concerned with her own entitlement and comfort. I have to agree, though, that her father was a humorless old fart. He didn't socialize. He hoarded his money, and was a cheapskate. Lizzie had never married, so marrying into money wouldn't appease her appetite for riches.
Could we turn the Lizzie Borden case into a feminist issue? I don't think so. Even if women were able to get good, well-paying careers at that time (not that women didn't work - they did), I don't think Lizzie would have wanted to get a good job and pay for her own upkeep. I think she was a rich, spoiled brat who had severe entitlement issues. Marrying into money had never presented itself as an opportunity for her. She wanted her father's money, and she felt entitled to it. The only way she could get it was to kill him and her stepmother.
Here's another interesting fact that a lot of people probably don't know. The bodies were kept in the dining room for a few days. That was common in that era. Funerals and even autopsies were performed in the home. It was stiflingly hot when the murders took place. The bodies decomposed rapidly in the dining room, and they must have stunk to high heaven. I'm sure the smell wasn't gone by the time they had been removed. That kind of stink sinks into the walls and floorboards. It must have been horrible to live in such a small, confined house with that kind of smell to deal with.
This case is the second most famous unsolved murder in the world. It is surpassed only by the Jack The Ripper case. I enjoyed visiting the house very much. It's a bed and breakfast. I'd love to stay there sometime soon. I'll sleep in the room where the stepmother was hacked to death. I love creepy things like that. I can never get enough of it.
Posted on July 10, 2006 at 11:39 AM | Permalink
Comments
See my comment on the earlier post. There were no other realistic suspects, no robbery was committed, and the degree of overkill indicates personal motive. If Bridget---the maid---had done it, she would have hanged.
The plan of the house, too, makes a stranger killing unlikely. An intruder would have gotten lost in the house, but Lizzie knew where to wait and where to hide. She sent the maid in and out so that she was the only one in the house at the time of each murder. I can't remember which parent she killed first, but there was about an hour's gap or more between the killings. It's extraordinary to think of waiting that long. Lizzie's killing was typical of the type of murder committed by women; she killed those nearest to her, for personal reasons, and perhaps with some hint of mental illness. I'd say greed was her primary motive, however. She wanted to be free. Ironically, it sounded like the town of Falls River turned against her when she didn't act too circumspect after she got away with it. Sure, be a rich lady murderess, but don't get too smug about it.
I've never been impressed by the Jack the Ripper slaying, either. Such killers have existed before, but with smaller populations they were caught faster and killed before they had the opportunity to kill a whole string of victims. This guy was no different from Bundy or Manson or whomever. He just got away with it. Such killers are not royalty or even particularly socially well-adjusted. They are not criminal masterminds. They are inadequate personalities who often aren't noticed till after they get arrested and they find bodies in their basement. Jack the Ripper was probably a butcher of some sort, but he was most definitely a man, and not a prince, either. Just because he could have been the Crown Prince doesn't mean he was, actually.
Posted by: ginmar at Jul 10, 2006 12:11:44 PM
Yup, the tour guide brought up the layout of the house. Plus, the front door was locked. No one from outside could have gotten in. Bridget (the maid) had to let Mr. Borden into the house when he came home from work early because the door was locked. He pitched a fit, banging on the door and shouting like you wouldn't believe. He already didn't feel well because of the food poisoning, and he was in a bad mood to begin with.
Plus, the way the house is laid out, Lizzie would have seen her stepmother from the front stairs. You can see the floor of that bedroom as you climb up the stairs. The body would have been very visible. Bridget always used the back stairs, but I think she ran down the main stairs to open the door to let Mr. Borden in.
Lizzie bought a mansion not far from the Borden home after she was acquitted. She liked theatre, and she had parties whose guests included lots of actors and other theatre people. They were viewed not much better than prostitutes in those days. Her sister lived with her, and was angry at all the theatre people traipsing about their new home. She thought they were riff raff, and she eventually moved out. Lizzie and her sister never talked again after that. Lizzie go the rich life she wanted after her parents were dead.
I wish I had thought to ask why she hated her stepmother so much. I think it might have been a personality clash, but I'm not sure. It was definitely a crime of greed, though. I'm not sure how Fall River felt about Lizzie after the murders. I'll have to check into that. I doubt society was thrilled with her, since she commingled with theatre people. They were considered trash. But Lizzie probably was happy. She finally led the life she wanted to lead, surrounded by theatre people and controlling her money.
Yeah, Jack the Ripper got away with it. I think the only reason the murders got so much attention was that they were so horrid. Disembowelings and the like. They were pretty heinous. Plus Jack taunted Scotland Yard. Don't piss off the cops. That they were prostitutes probably didn't matter much. I was never convinced that it was the Crown Prince reacting to syphilis. That just never convinced me.
Posted by: The Countess at Jul 10, 2006 12:35:30 PM
I think she did it. If caught off-guard I, 6'2, could easily be killed by a 5'0 100lb woman. Have you ever seen some scrawny Filipino kid with a butterfly knife? He could slice me to ribbons before I even knew I was in a fight. When weapons are involved size advantage is greatly diminished.
She had the ability. In her drug-addled mind she probably had motivation, too. She certainly had the opportunity. At 32 years of age she certainly had advantage in strength and agility over her 70 year old father.
There is no mention of the father's business partners or former employees. If Lizzie did not kill her parents then that is where I would look. These people would also know the layout of the house and potentially have a motive to kill Andrew and Abbie.
Too bad this didn't happen in 2006. A few months of crime lab investigation could conclusively solve this and there would've been no mystery.
Posted by: Dennis at Jul 10, 2006 12:48:47 PM
Her family was also sick from food poisoning, which would have made the killing easier for her. Her father was asleep on the couch fighting gut rot. It was easy to hack him to death. Her stepmom was likely making the bed in the guest room where her uncle slept. Uncle slept in a guest room rather than the attic where he usually slept. He also hadn't been to visit the Bordens in seven years, after seeing them quite regularly. He requested the guest room this time. That unusual point was brought up at trial.
I didn't check the transcripts (they're available online), but I'm sure business associates had been investigated. Plus, no one could get in the house from outside because the front door had been locked. I'm convinced it was an inside job, and that Lizzie had done it.
Yup, using Luminol and other CSI type things would have solved the crime in no time. I don't think the murder weapon was ever found. It's not definite that it was an ax or a hatchet. The only reason that it was thought to be either was that the coroner had opined that it was a hatchet or ax. It likely was either, but no murder weapon was ever found to my knowledge.
She got away with it. It's a fascinating case. I do plan to stay a night or two in the house. I'll let you and all my readers know anything new I can tell about the case, and if we see any ghosts. That wasn't the only murder in Fall River. Remember in a comment, if you read it, that in the house next door a woman murdered her children and then slit her own throat. That was before the Borden murders. The house is actually very nice. I look forward to staying there. And I'll eat lots of sugar cookies for breakfast, just like Lizzie did. The house make sugar cookies shaped like hatchets. That's funny. I have to remember to bring a camera the next time. I forgot my camera. I need to take pictures. I'll be careful to look for orbs and other weirdness. I like weird. ;)
Posted by: The Countess at Jul 10, 2006 1:05:39 PM
Did women suffer from post partom depression back then ?
Or does that only aplly to murdering your kids ...
Posted by: freedom lover at Jul 10, 2006 1:30:33 PM
"Did women suffer from post partom depression back then ?
Or does that only aplly to murdering your kids ..."
Considering Ms. Borden did not have children at the time of the murders I'd suspect that Postpartum Depression was not a factor in the murder of her parents.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postpartum_depression
Posted by: Dennis at Jul 10, 2006 2:07:51 PM
Freedom lover is trolling, I see.
Posted by: ginmar at Jul 10, 2006 3:41:26 PM
I agree; she did it, which shows that you can, indeed, chop your papa up in Massachusetts.
Now, anyone have an opinion on Constance Kent?
Posted by: Ledasmom at Jul 11, 2006 1:59:03 PM
Ginmar is right - that sounds like a troll. I think I know what the troll wants to bring up, and I won't let that happen here.
Dennis is right. Lizzie Borden had no children, so postpartum depression is off topic for this post.
Posted by: The Countess at Jul 11, 2006 2:52:39 PM
I never really bought it that she killed the kid, but then again who would? Hurting the mother by hurting the kid is just vile, and yet at her trial she claimed that she was treated well by both parents. The missing nightdress would have saturated with blood---if it was worm by the murderer. Also, how did she carry the kid through the house without making noise? Nothing makes sense except that she was nuts.
Posted by: ginmar at Jul 11, 2006 8:03:31 PM
Ah, someone else who's heard of the Kent case. There's one school of thought that the father killed the child accidentally (he died of smothering), but I think Constance must have either slashed his throat postmortem or seen it done, as she accurately described the results.
It seems as if the killing must have been accidental, because why else add the superfluous razor wound but to disguise the actual cause of death? I mean, if one's original intent was to blame an outsider for the killing, why not just kill the child with the razor to start with? And children of that age are appallingly easy to kill (in fact, I have to wonder about the diagnosis of smothering - did they know enough at that point to distinguish that from, say, death by shaking?).
Posted by: Ledasmom at Jul 12, 2006 11:17:31 PM
THE definitive Lizzie Borden information source can be found here, for FREE.
http://www.lizzieandrewborden.com
Posted by: Audrey at Jul 20, 2006 9:53:34 AM
I don't think they knew about shaken baby syndrome at that point. I can't remember how good the relationship was between the parents, but the case makes no sense to me at all It was definitely somebody in the house: kidnappings via window are rare, and when they do occur it's somebody who wants the kid for ransom or sexual abuse, in wihch case they take the kid with them so as to further the scheme. If they accidentally kill th4e kid, they take hte body with them, otherwise no ransom. I wonder at the nurse, myself. Anybody know if the husband was a philanderer? Sexual abuse of maids and other serving women was common in those days. She could frame pretty much anybody she liked, and she had access to the laundry, the kitchen, everything.
Posted by: ginmar at Jul 20, 2006 12:24:34 PM











[ekm]100x100[ekm].jpg)


