« Fathers' Rights Activists Aren't Happy With Spain's New No-Fault Divorce Law | Main | Two More Short Stories Accepted! »
April 25, 2005
UK - Electronic Tagging Mothers Not Likely To Become Law
I've written before about proposals in the UK to electronically tag mothers who, for whatever reason, do not abide by visitation contact orders. I had said that it is unlikely to pass because it is too punitive.
Well, it looks like I was right. MPs in the UK are probably going to drop that one. It has been seen as "humiliating." Tagging has also been viewed as "'disproportionate' and could be particularly difficult for the child." Instead, a "time and place requirement" [may] be imposed by the courts to help make an existing order work - perhaps by ensuring a parent is at an agreed place at a set time to allow contact."
Tagging moms and moms who supposedly don't allow court-ordered visitation has received a lot of media attention. The UK family law reforms don't pay as much mind to enforcing visitation when dad doesn't abide by his own orders. The media also hasn't paid attention to that issue. What about concern for the children who sit in the living room, with their bags packed, wondering why daddy doesn't show up? How about some punitive rules to make those fathers abide by their visitation that gets the same amount of attention as mothers who don't abide by visitation orders?
Posted on April 25, 2005 at 12:57 PM | Permalink
Comments
Because it's all about rights, not responsibilities.
Posted by: ginmar at Apr 25, 2005 1:00:34 PM
"I've written before about proposals in the UK to electronically tag mothers who, for whatever reason, do not abide by visitation contact orders. I had said that it is unlikely to pass because it is too punitive.
Well, it looks like I was right. MPs in the UK are probably going to drop that one."
For now...but they'll find a way to bring it back. Just like what they did in the US with imputed income. Orignally the imputed income was to go after men with REAL income and assets or that's what they claimed when it started...
Guess what, now in CA more women are imputed income then men...and if they honestly started looking at the profile of those women MOST of them are probably former stay-at-home mothers/housewives who NEVER worked, many never even filed their own income tax as they had NO income to report...but, of course, men have now worked the system to have these women imputed income...
It's ridiculous...
So that tagging will come back too...
I guarantee it...
Posted by: at Apr 25, 2005 2:02:48 PM
Hmmm .. doesn't seem to make a lot of sense does it: a committee going on about how serious maintaining contact is but then being unwilling to take enforcement steps because they are
"humiliating". Oh diddums. Don't forget that the courts have -and will maintain- the right to imprison the mom who flouts court orders without excuse and I for one (were I in the position of being a contact-order flouting mom) would rather be electronically-tagged rather than jailed. By failing to impose the tagging as an option no doubt this committee has destined a few ladies for time in "the big house" this year. By the way, once Blair wins this election (as he will) he won't do anything about contact rights anyway: he has just been using this to head off protest and criticism as usual.
Posted by: Steve at Apr 26, 2005 9:19:43 AM











[ekm]100x100[ekm].jpg)


